‘Blockchain, not Bitcoin has taken up the new mantra. DARPA is actively seeking experts to disclose how they could utilize decentralized consensus protocols without prior permissions to their own ends.
(DARPA) is invested in initiatives like Atlas, reminiscent of the iconic robots from Terminator films. Being heavily involved in the U.S. defense sector, they're eager to new ways apply blockchain technology across the 'defense' realm.
It’s quite improbable that DARPA’s curiosity in open consensus protocols aligns with the original motivations behind blockchain's creation. They’re particularly interested in utilizing blockchain without financial incentives, leaning instead toward offering access to data or computational capabilities as rewards.
DARPA Is on the Hunt for Revolutionary Blockchain Concepts, Dismissing Tokens
The notion that permissionless blockchains could operate sans direct rewards for network contributors is intriguingly unconventional.
Specifically, DARPA is looking for,
\"For the purpose of this RFI (Request For Information), DARPA is exclusively exploring permissionless consensus systems. Despite extensive public and private research into these protocols, DARPA is pursuing inquiries into less explored avenues of permissionless systems. This data could pave the way for a forthcoming DARPA initiative.\"
Bitcoin originated with the idea of facilitating payments without centralized authorities. This may seem ignored by major stakeholders, who now steer blockchain technology for their purposes.
It's evident why governments favor blockchains: they provide tamper-proof records. Once cryptocurrencies' freedom aspects are detached from blockchains, they become an optimal method for supervising daily human activities.
The EU is fervently exploring Blockchain, though not with a focus on Personal Privacy
The European Commission (EC) also seems to be hot on while opposing crypto. A recent conference highlighted blockchain's advantages, pending its accessibility by those in power, government to monitor its citizens.
Roberto Viola, the Director-General for communication networks in the EC, mentioned,
\"This association uniquely focuses on increasing trust in blockchain technology among governments and people,\" and \"It will also engage with the public about blockchain, a technology that should not be confused with enigmatic cryptocurrencies but linked to transparency, trackability, and a secure setting.\"
Defining a \"secure environment\" as Roberto did, invokes memories of historical Europe pursuing complete control over a panic-stricken citizenry.
When European Fascism peaked, digital payments were nonexistent. Now Brussels commands substantial power the EU yet few dissenting voices challenge this clear power consolidation intent on extending its reach further.
The Bronze Bull of Blockchain
It would be prudent for leading powers to remember lesson of Louis XVI and the havoc his absolute power ambition wrought.
His demise signified a broader shift away from centralized jurisdiction. Today's financial powerhouses might find parallels with the power structures of Revolutionary France and modern economic systems worth noting.
A system designed to document transactions allows for extensive public scrutiny, but should control waver, it could ensconce the political elite in an inescapable predicament.
A Real World
Maximilien Robespierre reveled in setting records straight with fervent means, utilizing access to incriminating documentation.
It's essential to recognize how control systems (power structures) might be overtaken by unforeseen players, underpinning the Enlightenment's notion of legal equity and ensuring no person is stripped of rights sans due legal process.
Distinguishing blockchain from bitcoin seems short-sighted initially, yet wielding a technology crafted to rekindle societal engagement with foundations of personal liberties might be perilous beyond political foresight.
