As the scaling debate As the evolution of cryptocurrencies advances, some potential solutions have been in the pipeline for quite some time now.
Specifically, in the case of Ethereum where decentralization is prioritized, security at the cost of scalability, integrating sharding alongside consensus mechanisms is seen as a crucial method to allow the network to scale efficiently while maintaining decentralization and security. Proof of Stake Navigating the complexities of sharding within decentralized, peer-to-peer environments
where the network's global state is continually evolving. such as Ethereum So, what exactly is sharding, and how does it enable blockchain networks to expand their capabilities?
The Intersection of Sharding and Distributed Computing
How Does Sharding Function in Blockchain Systems?
Fundamentally, sharding involves splitting data within a database horizontally. Google’s global Spanner database .
- The database is divided into smaller pieces known as 'shards', which combine to reconstruct the original database.
- In distributed blockchain ecosystems, the network is a web of nodes interacting in a peer-to-peer manner without a central controller.
- In the current blockchain configurations, each node preserves the complete state of the network and handles every transaction.
- This decentralization offers robust security, particularly in Proof of Work systems like
- , but it also introduces significant scalability challenges. Bitcoin and Ethereum Using Ethereum as an example, a full node within this
Ethereum Sharding
network stores the entire blockchain state, covering account balances, storage, and contract code. Ethereum Unfortunately, as network size increases rapidly, reaching consensus only scales linearly due to the communication required between nodes to achieve consensus.
Nodes within the network hold equivalent status, and each node processes and records all transactions. Consequently, issues like high gas fees and slower transaction confirmations become problematic in expansive networks like Ethereum. The
is restricted by the speed of individual nodes rather than the combined capabilities of the network. network Sharding addresses these challenges by providing a sophisticated solution. It involves organizing nodes into groups called shards, which process transactions specific to those groups. This enables multiple transactions to be processed simultaneously, enhancing throughput significantly.
A simpler analogy might be the division of a country, such as the United States, into states.
Each state (or shard, in this context) operates under the larger nation (Ethereum's network) with its own rules and populations, yet they share a common language and culture that unite them as part of the entire country.
“Visualize Ethereum as a collection of numerous islands. Each island governs itself independently. The inhabitants of each island, known as accounts, can freely interact and utilize its unique features. To communicate with other islands, a specific protocol must be used.”
Or even better, in Vitalik Buterin ’s own words:
As you observe, fragmenting the network into more manageable pieces enables it to function collectively as a whole, rather than being limited by the pace of individual nodes.
We continue to reference Ethereum due to its prominence and challenging sharding endeavors within the blockchain field, as Ethereum developers roll out what's referred to as 'state sharding'.
Sharding has historical roots that predate blockchain technology, finding applications in diverse setups from business database optimizations to
Ethereum's blockchain's current status is the 'global state', visible to everyone when they observe the blockchain at any given moment.
The challenge with Ethereum's sharding implementation is ensuring that as nodes are divided into smaller groups, they can still process specific transaction sets and update the network's state while maintaining validity.
Sharding in Ethereum is scheduled to be introduced in two stages, likely following
. The first phase will establish the data layer, defining which data resides in each shard. The second phase encompasses the state layer. Given its dynamic nature, a basic outline is as follows. Proof of Stake is implemented in the network Ethereum dissects the network into dedicated shards. Each shard handles a particular transaction group formed by grouping specific accounts, including smart contracts. Each group is defined by a header and a body, comprising:
The selection of validators through 'random sampling' (who authenticate the shard's transactions)
Header
- The shard ID of the transaction group
- State Root (the state of the shard's Merkle root before and after transaction execution)
- All transactions belonging to that shard's transaction group.
Body
- Transactions are shard-specific and occur between accounts native to that shard.
Upon transaction verification, the network's state evolves, adjusting account balances, storage, etc. To validate the transaction group, the pre-state root must align with the shard root in the global state. If they match, validation occurs, updating the global state via the shard's ID state root.
Rather than solely including a state root, each block in Ethereum's blockchain encompasses both a state root and a transaction group root. The transaction group root represents the Merkle root of all transaction groups from particular shards for that set of transactions.
In essence, a Merkle root of the different shards contains updated and validated transaction groups, stored within the blockchain alongside the revised state root.
Integrating Merkle tree principles is crucial for verifying the blockchain's integrity. Understanding how a
and specifically a Merkle root operates, can simplify the concepts involved. merkle tree Consensus within a shard is achieved through a Proof of Stake consensus among randomly chosen nodes applied for each consensus round.
Read: What is a Merkle Tree ?
This not only secures the necessary finality within shards but also offers a defense against potential attacks that a
could exploit within this context. Proof of Work blockchain The requisite hash power to dominate a shard in a Proof of Work sharded network is greatly decreased, making it more feasible for a malicious entity to seize control through computational force.
Such an adversary could disrupt other shards via the communication protocol, one of sharding architecture's more intricate and essential components. Randomly selecting validators within a shard thwarts this attack, as the attacker remains unaware of their designated shard until assignment.
Furthermore, random sampling identifies which validators genuinely authenticate each random validating set.
A functioning communication protocol is integral to sharding architecture's success. Consider it the universal language connecting the states within the broader United States.
However, crafting this protocol presents significant difficulties and must be done thoughtfully, employed only when necessary. It becomes essential when a node seeks information absent from its own shard, requiring outreach to others. This system is termed cross-shard communication.
Cross-shard communication utilizes the concept of transaction receipts. Receipts reside within a Merkle root, verifiably, but are not part of the state root.
When a shard receives a transaction from another, it verifies the Merkle root to ensure the receipt is unspent. The receipts exist in shared memory, auditable by other shards but unalterable. Consequently, shards communicate via distributed receipt storage.
Ethereum plans to introduce sharding following the Casper
Sharding Moving Forward
There have been updates concerning Ethereum 2.0 PoS upgrade . Recently, there Sharding finds application within other platforms too, which involve implementing both Casper and sharding.
. However, Zilliqa currently avoids implementing state sharding, opting instead for transaction and computation-focused sharding to enhance blockchain throughput. most notably Zilliqa Sharding offers promising solutions to blockchain's pressing issue: scalability.
Read our Guide to Zilliqa
Conclusion
While Bitcoin's lightning network remains in testing, displaying promising advancements, Ethereum's approach presents unique hurdles due to its scope as a Turing-complete 'world computer'.
Since sharding operates at the protocol level, it might not be essential for end users or dapp developers to master.
Despite this, Ethereum's ambitious state sharding endeavor for a massive decentralized network is a remarkable undertaking, and its successful execution would be a monumental achievement.
Blockchain writer, web developer, and content creator. Enthusiast of a decentralized web and future cryptocurrency platform developments. Reach out to [email protected]
